Dismissed
S v. S Engineering v Au Small Finance Bank Limited
DRTSA/385/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
¶2
| 0 S |
3.02.2 r. No. |
024 14 S.A. No.385/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.385/2022 | ||
| S.V.S. Engineering ..Applicant Versus AU Small Finance Bank Limited ..Defendants Mr. Avhad M. M. - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Shete Umesh N. – Advocate for defendants The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. The applicant has filed the present Securitisation Application in the name of SVS Engineering and the bank has filed its reply stating that they have no account in the name of SVS Engineering. 2. The bank further submits that they are having account in the name of VS Engineering. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.385/2022 stands dismissed with no orders as to costs. |
||
| B. The applicant is at liberty to file fresh Securitisation Application taking all the objections they might have taken in the present Securitisation Application C. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. D. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶3
[APK]
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
S.V.S. Engineering
- respondent
AU Small Finance Bank Limited
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court