Disposed
Karim Maheboob Syed v. Dcb Bank Limited
DRTSA/393/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, CAMP AT NANDED) ORDER SHEET
¶2
| 15 Sr |
.01.20 . No.2 |
24 2 S.A.No.393/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.393/2022 Karim Maheboob Syed ..Applicant Versus DCB Bank Limited ..Defendants Mr. Dodya Shrigopal G - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Thote D. K. - Advocate for respondent bank The matter is taken through Hybrid 1. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that the matter has been settled between the parties and the entire settlement amount has been deposited by the applicant and the bank has given no dues certificate. He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the applicant, I pass the following order : ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.393/2022 is disposed of as settled. B. All pending IA in the proceeding if any are disposed of accordingly. Interim orders if any also stands vacated C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
¶3
[APK]
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Karim Maheboob Syed
- respondent
DCB Bank Limited
Coram
AI extract
Vimal Gupta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court