The Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an amicable settlement between the applicant and the respondent bank and dismissed the stay application on that ground.
Stay application dismissed on the grounds of amicable settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoverYTribunal-III, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
Anjan Kar
vs
Case No.sA/36SlzO23
Ujjivan SmallFinanceBank Ltd'
| Orderwithsignature | dated signatureof |
|
|---|---|---|
| OrderNo.08 | Present: ForApplicant ForRespondent :Ld. CounselAsisBhattacharyaa :Ld.CounselRoshan Pathak 1A14445t24andlLt2g16,24aretakenupforhearing' Heard Ld.Counselforbothsides Considered. |
|
| Ld.CounselfortheSAApplicanthasendorsedonthe l"i:osZoi]i"a'tuqicstza"NotPressed"andpravsror ;?;;;;; t;"saanaattinelAsonthegroundassettled' Ld. Lawverappearingfor theRespondent Bankalso submttsthat il;;;i;; ,5"';iil";betweenthepartiesandtheRespondent Bankhasnoobjection, Sincethisis anamicable settlement betweentheparties and the i'ii?jll,"i,;*at-io*iina**themains A'thePraverisallowed' S.A. No. 365of2023 alongwithallpendingl A s'rf any'is iiipo."Jofutwithdrawnassettled amicably' Filebe consignedtoRecord Roomafterobserving allformalities' (KamalDe) PresidingOfflcer-DRT-3 |
Anjan Kar
Ujjivan Small Finance Bank Ltd
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
