The applicant in a securitisation application failed to appear for two consecutive hearings. The Presiding Officer dismissed the application for non-prosecution and disposed of any pending interim applications.
Securitisation Application No.336/2023 dismissed for non-prosecution; pending IA disposed of accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 21.03. Sr. No |
2024 .109 S.A.No.336/2023 |
|
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.336/2023 | ||
| Bhimashankar S/o Devidas Bolegave ..Applicant Versus Maharashtra Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd & others .. Respondent |
||
| None for the applicant. 1. On last date of hearing none appeared for the applicant as such in the interest of justice matter has re-notified for proper orders. 2. Today also none appears for the applicant. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.336/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
Bhimashankar S/o Devidas Bolegave
Maharashtra Nagari Sahakari Bank Ltd
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
