The Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the securitization application as a default application due to non-prosecution by the applicant after continuous absence of counsel.
Securitisation Application No.361/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
20.03.2024
| Sr. | No.8 | 4 SA No. 361/2022 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.361/2022 | ||
| Sharad Ashok Somvanshi ..Applicant Versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. B.R. Kedar - Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. In this matter nobody is appearing since 28thFebruary, 2024. |
||
| 2. Today also none appears. Earlier also on 17thOctober, 2023 nobody was appearing. It appears that the applicants are not interested in continuing with this securitization application. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.361/2022 stands dismissed in default for non-prosecution. |
||
| B. Accordingly all the interlocutory applications stand disposed off,. |
||
| C. File be consigned to the record room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ]
(SA No.361/2022) Page 1 of 1
Sharad Ashok Somvanshi
Aspire Home Finance Corporation Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
