Ms Gee Aar Refrigeration v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/32/2023 MS GEE AAR REFRIGERATION Vs CANARA BANK
22.04.2024 Item No.73
Present: Sh. Vivek Verma, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh. SC Prajapati, proxy Counsel for Sh. Nitin Grover, Counsel for respondent bank.
- Counsel for the applicant has produce on the record No
- Dues Certificate. Accordingly, the SA stands disposed of .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MS GEE AAR REFRIGERATION
- respondent
CANARA BANK
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court