Dismissed
Prakash Avantilal Doshi v. Bank of Baroda
DRTSA/32/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
¶2
01.03.2024 Sr. No.73
¶3
| SA No.32 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Prakash Avantilal Doshi Vs. Bank of Baroda |
| Ms Sonali Jain – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Ms Jain, representing the applicant, submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and therefore, Securitisation Application in its preset |
||
| form has become infructuous. The learned counsel | ||
| requests the Tribunal to dismiss the Securitisation Application. Accordingly, Securitisation Application No.32 of 2022 stands dismissed as infructuous with no order as to costs. |
||
| Radhika | Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Prakash Avantilal Doshi
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
AI extract
Radhika
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · P.o
- Order 2 — this page · Deepak M. Thakkar
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court