Dismissed

Icici Bank Limited v. Shweta

DRT1 Mar 2024OA/156/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal granted permission to the applicant ICICI Bank Ltd. to withdraw Original Application No.156 of 2024 after the Defendant's account was regularized upon a specific payment. Consequently, the main application and all pending interlocutory applications were dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw Original Application; OA and pending IA dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refunded.

Icici Bank Limited versus Shweta — Banking and Recovery | DRT (2024)

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

¶3

Sr. No.16

¶4

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.301 of 2024

¶5

¶6

ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.156 of 2024

¶7

ICICI Bank Ltd. … Applicant Versus Shweta Saxena … Defendant

¶8

Ms Ketki Minhas i/b M/s. H & M Legal Asso. – Advocates for the applicant.

¶9

None for defendant.

¶10

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer,^st March 2024.

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Ms Minhas submits that upon payment of Rs.19,33,234/-, the applicant regularized the defendant’s account. The learned counsel therefore, seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted. Interlocutory Application No.301 of 2024 is allowed with no order as to costs.

¶13

Sd/(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶14

Nidhi

¶15

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶16

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

ORDER SHEET

01.03.2024

Sr. No.16

		OA No.156 of 2024
classifi -cation	No. of Exh.	ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Shweta Saxena
		Ms Ketki Minhas i/b M/s. H & M Legal Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant.
	7 8	1. Ms Minhas has presented I.A. No.301 of 2024 supported by affidavit (exhibit-7) and additional affidavit (exhibit-8), which are taken on record. 2. Order in I.A. No.301 of 2024 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.301 of 2024, Original Application No.156 of 2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. 5. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of.
		Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶21

Nidhi

Icici Bank Limited v. Shweta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Icici Bank Limited v. Shweta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M Patankar Buildcons Pvt. Ltd. versus Bank of India

Mrs Jyoti Jaiswal versus Axis Bank

Joseph Edwin George versus Indian Bank

Mrs Shakuntala S Shet versus Asset Reconstruction Company India Limited

Jm Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Limited versus M/S Shri Shayam Metal Manufacturing

Canara Bank versus M/S Techno Lube India