Dismissed
Smt Baisakhi Bodhak v. Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.
DRTSA/307/2023
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Order dispensed with respondent's response; proceedings dismissed as withdrawn as settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
| Page No.- | Order Sheet( continuation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Case NO. SA | /307/2023 BAISAKHI BODHAK Vs. M/S. JANA SMALL F BANK LTD. |
INANCE |
| Date of the order |
Order with signature | Office action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary |
| 07/10/2024 | Ld. Advocate Mr. Subir Bera appears for the Applicant and pressing the withdrawal petition. Ld. Advocate, Ms. Kuheli Deb appears for the Respondent Bank. In the above said application it was stated that the Applicant has filed an application being aggrieved by the action of the bank. During pendency of the Recovery Proceedings there has been a settlement between the parties and the Bank has received full and final settlement of the dues. Hence, they do not want to proceed with the case. This application is affirmed by the Applicant and his signature is identified by Advocate on record. In view of this, no prejudice will be caused to the SA Respondent if their response is dispensed with in this IA. This instant SA and any other pending IAs are disposed of in the category of dismissed as withdrawn as settled. IA/2472/2024 is moved which is a put up application. Since the record is put up, the IA/2472/2024 is disposed of. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Officer |
Rina S.
Baisakhi Bodhak
M/s. Jana Small Finance Bank Ltd.
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court