Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed Securitisation Application No.303/2023 for non-prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear on multiple dates.
Securitisation Application and all Interlocutory Applications dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 19. Sr. |
04.20 No.25 |
24 SA No.303/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.303/2023 | ||
| Amit Bharat Rasane ..Applicants Versus Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd. & another ..Respondents None for the applicant. Mr. S.R. Vakil – Advocate for the respondent no.1. Mr. Bobby Agrawal – Advocate for the respondent no.2. The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. In this matter nobody appeared for the applicant on 02nd March, 2024 then on 26thMarch, 2024. Today also none appears for the applicant. 2. The reply has been filed by the respondent submitting that the 13(2) notices were duly served. The Track report is filed even the services of the 13(2) notices was also done through paper publication. However, there is no merit in this matter. The matter may be dismissed. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order. ORDER |
||
| A. The Securitisation Application No.303/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. B. Accordingly all the Interlocutory Applications stand disposed off. C. File be consigned to the record room. |
||
| (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ]
(SA No.303/2023) Page 1 of 1
Amit Bharat Rasane
Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd. & another
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
