Dismissed
Sri Subhendu Chakraborty and Anr. v. Bank of India
DRTSA/247/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Debts RecoveryTribunal-3,Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
aase No. sAl247 12022
suutrenau cnafrauo*ya lnr. tis. Bankof rndia
| Orderwithsignature | |
|---|---|
| OrderNo.6 Dt.atoat2024 Sl.No.13 |
Present: ForApplicant: ForDefendant: 1.4r.BiswanathPalwithS Pal, Ld. Counsels None, |
| LdCounselfortheAppllcantflledLA'No.3017of2024Prayingtot withdrawalofthemain S.A, TheaPplicationissupportedby AffidavitoftheapplicantSriSubhendu Chakraborty,resident of 87l1,I'lalanchaRoad,Harinagar, p.S.Naihati,Pin-743166During thependencyoftheS.A,thematterhas beensettledwiththe Respondent Bankand anamountofRs.5 50lakhisdepositedby theApplicant asperOTSscheme. Respondent Bankis notgoingto continuewith theinstantproceedingand hasissueda'NoDues Certificate'dated 6/Oal2O24,Sincethislsanamicablesettlement betweenthepartaesandtheApplicant intendstowithdrawthe mainS.A.,noprejudicewillbecaused iftheI.A.isallowedwithout invitingresponsefrom otherside.Accordingly,theinstantI.A.is allowedandstands disposedofinthecategoryofdismissedas withdrawn as settledamicably,I.A.No. 3016of2024being the putuppetitlonisalso dlsposed of. S.A.No.247of2022 alongwith all otherpendingLA.s, ifany,are disposedofaswithdrawn. RespondentBank is directedtoreturntheMortgaged Deedand otherdocumentstotheSARFAESIApplicant,ifthesearenot alreadyreturnedwithin15daysfrom thedate ofthisorder. File beconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities, (KamalDef PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court