Dismissed
Farzana Yasmin v. Indian Bank
DRTSA/18/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Debts Recovery Tribunal dismissed the SARFAESI action application (No. 1A/2022) as non-prosecution due to the applicant's complete lackadaisical attitude and refusal to effect service or proceed.
What did the court decide?
SA No. 1A/2022 is dismissed for non-prosecution and non-compliance of the order of the Tribunal.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-3, KOLKATA Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶2
| CaseNo.SA/ | 1A/2022 Farzana YasminVs.I:ilidD@,n\1 |
4n'.I |
|---|---|---|
| Dateof Order |
Orderwithsignatu re | Officeaction dated Signature ofparties when |
| Order No.05 Dt.08.08.2024 Sl.No.25 |
TSAapplicant:None RespondentBank:None Recordis placedtodayfromRegistrarBench. None aDpearsfrom either of thesides. Itappearsthat thecasewasfiled on05.01.2022 and sincethentheSarfaesiapplicantisnotexhibiting anything positivetopursuethecase. Severalopportunitieswere giventotheSA applicanttoeffectcompleteservicebut theSA applicantdidnotturnup.Perusedtheordersdated 14.06.2022;01.03.2023and06.05.2024. Positionofthecaserecordshowsthatthecasehas lamentably been hanging onfirefordisposalforyears together. Thisisanoldpendingcase. Itappearsthat theSarfaesiapplicantisexhibiting completeIackadaisicalattitudetoproceedwiththe case. Onperusalofcase record,itappearsthatthe Sarfaesiapplicantis notat allwillingtoproceedwith thecase.Hence, Ordered SA beingNo.tg/2022 be andthesameisthus dismissedfornonprosecutionandalsofornon complianceoFtheorderofthisTribunal. |
|
| (I(AMALDE) PRESIDINGOFFICER DRT-III,KOLKATA |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Farzana Yasmin
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
AMALDE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court