Disposed

Smt Simran Upadhyay v. Axis Bank

DRT5 Mar 2024SA/234/2024

Download

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Disposed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

PAGE No.

CONTD. ORDER.SHEET

CASE No.

DATE	DESGRIPTION OF THE ORDER	REMARK
SA2 0s103124	Shri Prabhat^{Yadav,AdvfortheApplicant} ShriAdamya^{Bajpai,AdvfortheRespondent}
	f e 1.Matteristaken^{uPforhearingonL} No.l424124application^{forcondonation(} delay and^{interimreliefasprayedthroughS'} againsttheorder^{dated31105123passedbytt} AdditionalCollector^BhoPal.
	S x r a e rh lx 1S e ot 2.Atthe very^{outsetonmatter beingtake} ApplicantCounsel^{submitsthat the Applican} aie-readyto^{deposittotaloutstandingwithins} monthswith six^{installmentsandpraysf} disposalof^{thisSAbyissuing suchdirecti<} finally. 3.Onbeing^{askedabouttoconsentfortl} sameRespondent^{CounselShriAdam'} Bajpai,is^{agreetodisposalofthis SAift} afpticantsare^{readytopaytotaloutstandi} amount approx^{Rs.29,74,367l-subject} depositinglast^{installmentasperclot} statementbeing^{given bythe RespondentNo'} 4.Applicant^{Counselisagreetodepositto} outstanding^{amountRs.29,74,367l'w} additionalamount^{asbeingintimatedthrou} closerstatement^{within sixmonths with} installments. 5.Applicant^{Counsel submitsthatforfilingt} SAsomedelaY^{hasbeencausedbecar} Applicanttried^{tosettlethematter with} RespondentNo.l^{and whendisputehas} been sought^{ApplicanthasfiledthisSAi} praysforcondonation^ofdelaY. d

¶5

PAGE No.

¶6

CONTD. ORDER.SHEET

Smt Simran Upadhyay versus Axis Bank — DRT (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶8

DATE	DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER	REMARK
	6.ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthat without givenanyopportunityofhearingtothe Applicantorderhasbeen passed. 7.ApplicantCounselfurthersubmitsthat Applicantissufferingfromcancerandif possessionofherhousemaybetakenshe suffers greatloss. 8. Since both thecounselsareagreetodisposed ofthisSAfinallyasperconsensus arrived betweenthepartiesnowthereisnoneedto decideapplicationforcondonationofdelayon merit. 9. Aspercontentionsofboththesidein opinionofthisBenchsincetheApplicantsare readytodeposittotaloutstandingthenitwould be^justandpropertogivesome reasonabletime totheApplicantsso that they mayarrange moneywhichhastobedeposited. 10.Thereforelookingtoconsensusofboththe sidethisSAisbeingdisposedofwith followingconditions:- (i)The Applicants shalldepositintheirloan accountRs.29,74,3671-(RupeesTwentyNine Lac,SeventyFourThousand,ThreeHundred SixtySevenonly) withthe RespondentNo.lin sixinstallmentswithinsixmonthsfromtoday outofitRs.5,00,000/-(RupeesFive Lac only) shallbedepositedwithin30daysi.e., till 05104124,second installmentRs.5,00,000/- (RupeesFive Lac only)shallbedeposited within30daysi.e.,till05105124,third O/'/

¶12

DATE	DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER		REMARK
	installmentRs.5,00,000/-^(RupeesFiveL only)shall bedeposited^{within30days i.e.,1} 05l06l24,fourth^{installmentRs.5,00,00t} (RupeesFiveLac only)shallbe^deposit within30daysi.e.,till^05107124,f-t installmentRs.5,00,000/-^(RupeesFiveL only)shall bedeposited^{within30daysi.e.,} 0s108124. (ii)TheApplicantshalldeposit^Rs.4,74,36 (RupeesFour Lac,Seventy^FourThousar Three HundredSixty^{Sevenonly)within} daysi.e.,till^{05109124includingremain} amount as intimated^{bytheRespondentN} throughforeclosure^{statementwithin} workingdaysafter^{depositingfifthinstallm} i.e.05108124. (iii)TheRespondentNo.1^{is directedtosup} foreclosurestatement^{tothe Applicantwit} 10workingdays^{from thedateofdeposit} fifthinstallment^{i.e.,05108124.} (iv)Subjecttodepositing^theamount aforesaid,^{RespondentNo.1isdirectednot} takecoercive^{actionagainsttheapplicants} pursuanttoorder dated^{31105123passedby} AdditionalCollector,^{thatistosay executlor]} theorder^{passedbythe AdditionalColle!} Bhopal,is hereby^{stayedwithimrnediateef1} fromtoday.	I d 1t d, 0 1 l0 nt v n ng AS to ln e of or
	(v)Iftheapplicantfails^tocomply conditions^{mentioned above,theResponc} No.1isfreeto^{takeactionagainst} applicants as^{perorder dated31105123 pa} UyttreAdditional^{Collector,District-Bhopal} U^z	^s t e ed

Smt Simran Upadhyay v. Axis Bank

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Malkhan Singh versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.

Pankaj Sharma Son of Late Nk Sharma Aged About Years versus Chief Manager and Authorized Officer Edel Weiss Assets Reconstruction Company Branch Mumbai

Ms Shrawan Kumar Agrawal versus Punjab National Bank

Sarita Barua versus Punjab National Bank

Smt Simran Upadhyay v. Axis Bank

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Case details

Similar cases

Malkhan Singh versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.

Pankaj Sharma Son of Late Nk Sharma Aged About Years versus Chief Manager and Authorized Officer Edel Weiss Assets Reconstruction Company Branch Mumbai

Ms Shrawan Kumar Agrawal versus Punjab National Bank

Sarita Barua versus Punjab National Bank

Punjab National Bank versus M/S Bhanumati Warehouse

Indian Bank versus Krishna Poly Extrusion

DATE	DESGRIPTION OF THE ORDER	REMARK
	I 1.Subjecttoconditionsmentioned above,th SAisfinallydisposed of.
	12. Recordbecons tothe (Ram was Patel) PresidingOfficer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G)