The Special Application filed by the applicant was dismissed due to non-compliance with the court order dated 07/12/2023 requiring service of the SA copy on the respondent. The applicant failed to appear, and no copy was served despite prior directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| Order Sheet( continuation) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No. SA/23/2023 |
Smt. Purnima Bairagya & Anr.–Vs- Indian Bank | |
| Date of Order |
Order with signature | O ffice action with date and dated signature of parties when necessary |
| 02/02/2024 Sl. No. 37 RC |
None appears for the Applicant. Ld. Advocate appears for the Respondent Bank submits that copy of SA has not been served upon them. In earlier date 25.09.2023 and 07/12/2023 applicant was directed to serve copy of SA upon the respondent bank failing which SA will be liable to be dismissed. Today no one appeared for the applicant and has not been compiled with the order dated 07/12/2023. Hence the SA is dismissed for non compliance of the order. File be consigned to the record room. |
|
| (AMBUJA MOHAN DAS) PRESIDING OFFICER DRT-I, KOLKATA |
Smt. Purnima Bairagya & Anr.
Indian Bank
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
