The Tribunal accepted the Applicant's plea for condonation of delay and granted a stay on the execution of an ADM order. The relief is conditional upon the deposit of the full outstanding amount (Rs. 48 Lakhs) within four months.
Stay on execution; Respondent restrained from coercive action upon deposit of Rs. 48 Lakhs in installments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
CASE No..
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sA226124 3U07121 |
ShriAshishGanguly,Advforthe Applicant ShriAdamyaBajpai,Advforthe Respondent |
|
| LMatteristakenupforhearingon applicationforcondonationofdelayIA No.l419124 andinterimreliefasprayed through SAagainstthe executionoforder dated05107123passedbytheADM Badwani. |
||
| 2.OnmatterbeingtakenAPPIicant Counsel submitsthatApplicantthrough theircounselfiledreplybefore theADM Courtandthecasewasfixedforhearing notfororderondated23105123but withouthearingtheADMhaspassed the orderwhich wasnotservedtothe Applicant. |
||
| 3.ApplicantCounselinvitingattentionon notice dated23101124issuedbythe TehsildarDistrict-Badwanisubmitsthat thelocalcounseloftheApplicantwas also notinformed abouttheproceedingof ADMthereforethroughnoticedated 23101124Applicantscameto knownabout theorderpassedbytheADMthereafter Applicantsappliedforcertifiedcopyand filed thisSAwhichiswithintime. andfiledthe plytherelbrethereisno 4.On the otherhandRespondent Counsel submitsthatorderpassedu/s14isby- parteorder andtheApplicantsappeared |
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
PAGE No
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHEORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| reasontobelieve thatApplicantswere not havingknowledgeaboutpassingthe order. |
||
| notexecutetheorderdated passedbytheADMBadwani. 5.RespondentCounselfurthersubmits that thereis adelayofapproxmorethan five tosixmonthsfromthedateoforder. 6.RespondentCounselfurthersubmits that.itisthe dutyoftheApplicantto vigilantandkeeptherecordoithecase andtheycannotshifttheirresponsibility byblaminghislawyerandopposesthl prayerforcondonationofdelayandalso praysfordismissal of thisSA. 7.ApplicantCounselsubmitsthatthe Applicants arewilling torepaythetotal outstandingasintimatedbythe RespondentF.Ihowever theywanissome reasonabletime toarrangethe money. 8.RespondentCounselapprisedthatas on todayRs.48Lac isoutstanding againstthe Applicants. 9.Respondent Counselfurthersubmits that ifthe Applicantsare ready andwillingto deposittotaloutstanding amount wiihin fourmonths thentheReipondentF.lshall 0st07t23 |
||
| 10.Lookingtosubmissionofboththe counselsinopinionofthisBenchthisSA may bedisposedofsu deposittotaloutstandin bjecttolibertyto gamountRs.48 |
PAGE No.
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
CASE No..
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| Lac withinreasonabletimeas grantedby this Tribunal. being Il.Thereforethis SAoftheApplicantsis beingdisposedoffinallysubjectto conditionsmentionedasbelow:- |
||
| (i)TheApplicantsshalldeposittotal outstandingamountRs.48,00,000/- (RupeesForryEightLaconly)withinfour monthsfromtoday. |
||
| (ii)OutofthattheApplicantsshall depositRs.12,00,000/-(Rupees Twelve Laconly)withinseven daysthatistosay on orbefore09108124. (iii)ThereaftertheApplicantsshalldeposit Rs.9,00,000/-(RupeesNineLaconly) withinnext28daysi.e.onorbefore 04109124thereaftertheApplicantsshall depositRs.9,00,000/-(RupeesNineLac only)withinnext 28daysi.e. on orbefore 03110124 thereaftertheApplicantsshall depositRs.9,00,000/-(RupeesNineLac only)withinnext29days i.e.onorbefore 01llll24thereaftertheApplicantsshall depositRs.9,00,000/-(RupeesNineLac only)withinnext 30daysi.e.onorbefore 02tr2t24. (iv)Subjecttodepositingtheamountas aforesaid, RespondentF.lis directednotto take coerciveactionagainsttheapplicants inpursuanttoorderdated05107123passed bytheADM,thatistosayexecutionofthe |
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| orderpassedbytheADMBadwani,is herebystayedwiththeeffectfromtoday. |
||
| (v)iftheApplicantfailsrocomplythe conditionsmentionedabove,the RespondentF.Iisfreetotakeaction againsttheapplicantasperorderdated 05107123passedbytheADM,Badwani. |
||
| 12.On theconditionsmentioned aforesaid, this SAisstand disposedoffinally. |
||
| 13.Recordbe room. consignedtotherecord (Ram iwasPatel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the current stay order is legally maintainable despite the significant delay in filing the writ petition.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Applicant (Shri Ashish Ganguly)
Respondent F.I
Ramчив was Patel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
