The Service Appeal filed before the DRT, Jabalpur was allowed as the Applicant Counsel withdrawn the same which was condoned by the Respondent dealing.
Withdrawal of the Service Appeal allowed and the appeal disposed off.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
PAGE No.
CASE No.
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| sAt93t22 3u07t24 |
ShriP.K.Shroti,AdvfortheApplicant ShriAbhishek Agrawal,Advforthe Respondent |
|
| Onmatter being takenApplicantCounsel praysforpermission towithdrawthisSA. |
||
| Respondent Counselhasno objection. | ||
| Asprayed,SA withdrawn. IS disposedofas |
||
| Recordbeconsignedtothe cord room. |
||
| (Ram I atel) PresidingOfficer DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.G.) |
Shri P.K. Shroti
Shri Abhishek Agrawal
Ram I atel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
