The Debts Recovery Tribunal in Bombay disposed of the applicants' application on the merits, dismissing the case due to a failure by the applicants to comply with a prior order and their subsequent absence from the hearing.
Securitisation Application No.225 of 2023 is dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
19.04.2024 Sr. No.35
| SA No.225 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Mr. Abdul Rehman Gulam Mohamed Patni & Ors. Vs. Bank of Baroda Patni |
| None for the applicants. Mr Harsh Gutka i/b M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co. – Advocates for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order-sheet maintained by the learned Registrar shows that the applicant failed to comply the order dated 16th June 2023 and therefore, it is listed under caption ‘dismissal’. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, Securitisation Application No.225 of 2023 sands dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
