The Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application for permission to withdraw an original recovery application after the parties settled the dispute. Permission was granted for withdrawal and refund of court fees.
Permission granted to withdraw the original application and refund court fees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.33
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.736 of 2024 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.373 of 2022
ICICI Bank Ltd.
… Applicant
Versus
Vishal Vinod Luthira Luthira … Defendant
Ms Ketki Minhas i/b M/s. H & M Legal Asso. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 19th April 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
19.04.2024 Sr. No.33
| OA No.373 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Vishal Vinod Luthira Luthira |
| Ms Ketki Minhas i/b M/s. H & M Legal Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.736 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.736 of 2024, Original Application No.373 of 2022, stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. 4. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
ICICI Bank Ltd.
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
