Allowed
Ms Ganga Enterprises v. Karnataka Bank Limited
DRTSA/22/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Allowed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sA22t2 05t0u24 |
MissTusiShah,AdvfortheApplicant Noneforthe Respondent Matter istakenupforhearingonIAno.50 applicationforwithdrawal. Onmatter beingtakenApplicantCounsel invitingattentiononNOCdated02101 submitsthatdisputebetweentheparties already been resolved andNOChasalre ApplicantCounselfurtherpraysadirection been issuedthereforeApplicants withdraw thisSA. releasethetitledocuments. Sincenooneappearedonbehalf Respondenttoopposethewithdrawal directiontoreturn thetitledocumentslook toNOCprayerfor withdrawalisallowed. Applicantsideispermittedtowithdrawt SA. Respondent-Bankisdirectedtorelease titledocumentswithin15 workingdays Applicantifnot transaction. neededinanyot SAis disposedofaswithdrawn. Recordbeconsigned to the record room. (Ra s Patel) t PresidinqOfficer D.R.T,Jabalpur (M.P&C.G) |
of to v oE is e to er 4 aS v 4 d o |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Miss Tusi Shah
- respondent
Respondent Bank
Coram
AI extract
D.R. Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court