Santu Mistry and Anr. v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 25.1.2024. The section 31 application was dismissed for default. No substantive issues were considered.
The applicant failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 25.1.2024. The section 31 application was dismissed for default. No substantive issues were considered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
| Order Sheet | ||
|---|---|---|
| Case No. SA 152/2023 | SANTU MISTRI AND ANR –VS- CANARA BANK & ANR. | |
| Date of the Order |
Order with Signature | Office action with date and dated Signature of Parties when necessary |
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
25.1.2024 (Sl. No. 15) Mr. Amit Gupta. … For the Respondent Bank. None appears for the sarfaesi applicant. Learned counsel for the respondent bank is present and submits that the respondent bank has filed objection in August, 2023 and served copy on the applicant in October, 2023. Today the matter is posted for hearing SA. The applicant is not present. SA is dismissed for default. (Ambuja Mohan Das) Presiding Offi cer ac
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL 1, KOLKATA
SANTU MISTRI AND ANR
CANARA BANK & ANR
Ambuja Mohan Das
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court