Debts Recovery Tribunal-I, Chandigarh disposed of Special Appeal No.147/2022 raised by NARESH KUMAR against HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK as the applicant had no instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/147/2022 NARESH KUMAR Vs HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
19.03.2024 Item No.94
Present: Sh. Rajneesh Chauhan, Counsel for the Applicant. Sh. D.S. Bainola, Counsel for respondent bank.
Counsel for the applicant states that he has no instructions from the applicant. Accordingly, the SA is hereby disposed of . File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
MANOJ
NARESH KUMAR
HIMACHAL PRADESH GRAMIN BANK
A S Narang
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
