Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an interlocutory application for withdrawal of Securitisation Application No.143 of 2024. The application was withdrawn by consent and the Securitisation Application was consequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Securitisation Application No.143 of 2024 dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.4
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.920 of 2024 In SECURITISATION APPLICATION
NO.143 of 2024
Sumit Infra Services Pvt. Ltd.
… Applicant
Versus
HDFC Bank … Defendant
Mr Puneet Gogad – Advocate for the applicant.
Mr Devesh Dange i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners – Advocates for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 26th April 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
26.04.2024 Sr. No.4
| SA No.143 of 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Sunit Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. HDFC Bank |
| Mr Puneet Gogad – Advocate for the applicant. Mr Devesh Dange i/b M/s. Vidhii Partners – Advocates for defendant. |
||
| 8 | 1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.920 of 2024 supported by affidavit (exhibit-8), which is taken on record. 2. Order in Interlocutory Application No.920 of 2024 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.920 of 2024, Securitisation Application No.143 of 2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. |
|
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Sumit Infra Services Pvt. Ltd.
HDFC Bank
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
