DRT allowed a refund of court fees after parties settled a receivership application amicably. The original application was dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant.
Grant of refund of court fees and dismissal of original application 524 of 2024 as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.5
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.901 of 2024
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.524 of 2024
State Bank of India
… Applicant
Versus
M/s. Siddhi Vinayak Enterprises … Defendant Mantri
Ms Saraswati Rajpurohit i/b Mr Rajkumar Shukla – Advocate for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 26th April 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
| 26.04 | .2024 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sr. N |
o.5 | OA No.524 of 2024 |
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
State Bank of India Vs. M/s. Sidhi Vinayak Enterprises Mantri |
| Ms Saraswati Rajpurohit i/b Mr Rajkumar Shukla – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.901 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in Interlocutory Application No.901 of 2024, Original Application No.524 of 2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
State Bank of India
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
