Amarjit Singh v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh dismissed the applicant’s appeal in default due to non-appearance despite multiple calls for hearing.
What did the court decide?
Application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default.
What the court decided
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I, CHANDIGARH
SA/141/2024 AMARJIT SINGH Vs BANK OF INDIA
22.04.2024 Item No.102
Present: None for the Applicant.
Sh. KPS Dhillon, Counsel for respondent bank.
Mr. Dhillon, states that respondent bank has already withdrawn 13(2) and 13(4) notices. Case called several times since morning but nobody is appearing on behalf of the applicant. It is already 03:00 p.m. It appears that applicant is not interested in pursuing this matter. Therefore, application filed by the applicant is dismissed in default .
File be consigned to record room after due compliance.
(A S Narang) Presiding Officer DRT-I, Chandigarh
PANKAJ
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Amarjit Singh
- respondent
Bank of India
Coram
A S Narang
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court