The applicant, who claimed to be paying EMIs and clearing dues, sought securitisation. The tribunal directed the applicant to pay a specified amount before disposing of the application, noting that the bank was seeking further funds.
Direction to the applicant to pay the specified amount demanded by the bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 2 S |
1.03.2 r. No. |
024 71 S.A.No.11/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITISATION APPLICATION No.11/2023 | ||
| Mrs Shailesh Ajay Yadav .. Applicant Versus Dombivli Nagari Sahakari Bank Limited & others .. Respondent Mr. Dodya Shrigopal G - Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Tungar Nikhilesh – Advocate for respondents 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that they are paying the regular EMI and they have also cleared the overdue amount. The learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the bank is seeking some more amount. 2. Let the applicant pay the said amount. 3. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER A. The Securitisation Application No.11/2023 stands disposed of. |
||
| B. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. C. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
Mrs Shailesh Ajay Yadav
Dombivli Nagari Sahakari Bank Limited
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
