Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. M/S Om Jewellwers
DRTOA/98/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
¶2
| CaseNo.OA/9 | al2022 "llewellers |
|---|---|
| Dateof Order |
orderwithsignature |
| OrderNo.4 pt.22/95/-2024 SLNa-75 |
Present: ForApplicant:PDulta,LdCounsel For DeFendant:None |
| LdCounselfor theApplicantfiledLA.No.1224of 2022 tnviewof the factthattheO.A. wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs. 46,03,886.30/- andprayedfor withdrawal of thepresentO.A. The application is supportedby affidavilofIYr.Prosenjit Roy,Senior IVanageroftheapplicant Bank. Duringthependencyof theO.A. the defendanthavecompromasedandsettledthematterand the applicant bankhas realizedandreceivedthesettled amountand issuedthe 'NoDues Certificate'dated19104/2022andmade prayertodisposeofthe matterfornonprosecution.There isno otherimpedimentifprayerissoallowed.Accordingly,l.A.No. 1224of 2022rsdisposedoFas wlhdrawnassettledamrcably. TheAppicantrs drrectedloreturn theoriginaTitleDeedtothe O.A.defendantsif itisnotalready relurnedwithin15daysirom thedateof lhisorder. |
|
| O.A. No.98of2022aonq withallpendingLA.s,fany,are dismrssed aswrthdra!/nassetled am cably. |
|
| FrlebeconsignedtoRecord Roomaflerobserving allforrralitres. (Kamal De) PresrdrngOfficer DRT3,Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Ldwellers
- respondent
Defendant
Coram
AI extract
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court