Uco Bank v. Abhijit Boral
Case brief
What is this about?
This order disposed of an ongoing order against the defendant as the debt was settled amicably and a No Dues Certificate was issued. The main order was dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Order No. 4 pt. 2 dated 07/2024 Sl.No. 20 was dismissed as withdrawn; applicant directed to return original Title Deed within 15 days.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Tribunal-3, Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation)
| CaseNo,OAl | 94l2024 UCOBankvs.AbhijitBoral |
|---|---|
| Dateof order |
orderwithsignature |
| OrderNo.4 pt.2t07/2024 Sl.No.20 |
Presenti ForApplicant ForDefendant Md.Babulal Mollah,LdCounsel |
| 50m | LdCounselfor theApplicantfiledI.A.No.2196of2024inviewof the factthattheO.A.wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs. 1,12,62,A6O.1a/-andprayedforwithdrawalof thepresentO.A, Theapplicationis supportedbyamdavatofMs. PurabiDas Mehra, Chief ManageroftheApplacantBank. Duringthependenc"yof the O,A,thedefendanthave compromisedandsettledthematter andtheapplicantbank hasrealizedandreceivedthesettled amountandissued'NoDuesCertificate'andmadeprayerto disposeofthematterfornonprosecution.Thereisnoother impedimentifprayer issoallowed,Accordingly,LA.No. 2196of 2024isdisposedofas withdrawn as settledamicably.I.A.No 2195 beingtheputuppetitionis also disposedof. The Applicant is directedtoreturn theoriginalTitleDeedtothe O.A,defendantsif itisnotalready returnedwithin15daysfrom the dateof thisorder.Sofar asrefundofCourtfeels concerned, the Applicant mayapproach beforetheLdRegistrar whowilltake appropriatedecisioninthe matterasperextantrules. O.A.No.94of2024alongwithallpendingI.A.s,ifany.are dismissedaswithdrawnassettled amicably. File beconsignedtoRecord Roomafterobservingall formalities (KamalDe) PresidingOfficer DRT-3, Kolkata |
Parties & counsel
- applicant
UCOBank
- respondent
Abhijit Boral
Coram
Kamal De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court