Idbi Bank v. Abdul Samad
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRT allowed the bank applicant to withdraw its original application, holding that as the lender, it has dominus litis to settle the matter and determine the value of dues.
What did the court decide?
Original Application was withdrawn, the withdrawal was allowed, and the OA was disposed of.
What the court decided
| 25/04/2024 | Ex. No. |
Before Presiding Officer Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar, DRT-1, Mumbai. Roznama in OA 750 of 2022 IDBI Bank Vs Abdul Samad Moidin |
Next date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advocate for the Applicant present. IA No. 857/2024 1. The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Applicant Bank seeking permission to withdraw the Original Application as they have settled the matter out of court with the defendants and received an amount of Rs.39,20,000/- (Rupees Thirty Nine Lacs Twenty Thousand Only) towards full and final settlement of entire OA claim of Rs. 42,25,480/-. 2. Considered the contentions of Ld. Counsel for the applicant and gone through the record as well as case laws on the subject. 3. The Hon’ble High Court of Delhi in the matter of Satish Chand Gupta & Ors. Vs. SBI-W.P © 2588/2010 held that “…..DRT can have no objection to the same as the |
|||
| bank which is claimant has agreed to the |
same. The bank is dominus litis and it is for the bank to decide as to against which party it desires the litigation to continue. It is purely a contractual matter and the bank in its wisdom decided to settle the claim against the petitioners…..”. It was further laid down that the Tribunal appears to think that it is some kind of Ombudsman/ Auditor of the bank to scrutinize the settlement arrived between the parties. The Tribunal is no one to decide as to at what value the bank should settle its dues with the borrower especially when the bank has Managers who have acted in pursuance to authorization in their favour and after due consideration of the proposal of the petitioners….”. 4. In the light of above, since the account impugned has already been closed in terms of settlement between the parties and Bank has already received the entire settlement amount, further the bank has dominus litis in their matter, therefore, IA No. 857/2024 is allowed and Original is as Application hereby disposed
4.
withdrawn. 5. The Registry of this Tribunal is hereby directed to return the complete documents of the OA to the authorized officer of the applicant bank before the Ld. Registrar on 09/05/2024 after obtaining necessary acknowledgment. However, the order sheets as well as the plaint and necessary documents shall be kept with this Tribunal. 6. The applicant is directed to follow the procedure of refund of court fees as per the DRT (Refund of Court fee) Rules 2013. File be closed and consigned to record room. P.O. DRT-I
Parties & counsel
- applicant
IDBI Bank
- respondent
Abdul Samad Moidin
Coram
Dr. Rekha G. Dhakar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court