Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. dhiraj
DRTOA/747/2024
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. O RDER-SHEET
¶3
CASE No.
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA747t24 04/10t24 |
Applicantby ShriShreyasDubey, Advocate NonefortheDefendants |
|
| Counse[fortheApplicant Bankhasfitedan AppticationforWithdrawalofthecaselA6229/24 dated 13/09/24atongwithAffidavitofShriAshish Gupta, ChiefManager.ltisstatedthatthe Applicant-BankhasfitedthepresentoriginaI applicationforrecoveryofRs.21,82,617.62 together withinterestandcosts againsttheDefendants.ltis furtherstatedthatduringthependencyof theOAthe matterissettledandtheDefendants havedeposited totalsetttementamountofRs.4Lacandtheaccount hasbeen ctosed. TheCounselfortheAppticant-bank furtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentOA. |
||
| therecordroom. (RamNi sPatet) Presidingofficer ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Appticant-Bankandthesubmissionmadebythe CounselforAppticantthat theDefendanthas depositedanamountofRs.4towardsfuttand finat setttementofthecase,thepresentOAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Applicant
- respondent
Defendants
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court