Disposed
Bank of Baroda v. Mohanlal
DRTOA/745/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The presiding officer disposed of an original application for recovery filed by a Bank as withdrawn after the case was settled and the Defendants deposited Rs. 4 lakhs.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the original recovery application allowed; matter disposed of as withdrawn.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶3
CASE No
¶4
| OATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA745t24 04/10t24 |
Appticantby ShriShreyasDubey, Advocate NonefortheDefendants |
|
| CounselfortheAppticantBankhasfitedan AppticationforWithdrawatofthecaselA6229/24 dated13/09124 alongwithAffidavitofShriAshish Gupta, ChiefManager.ltisstatedthatthe Appticant-Bankhasfitedthepresentoriginal applicationforrecoveryofRs.21,85,614.82 together withinterestandcosts againsttheDefendants.ltis furtherstatedthatduringthependencyof theOAthe matterissettledandtheDefendants havedeposited totalsetttementamountofRs.4Lacandtheaccount hasbeen ctosed.TheCounselfortheAppticant-bank furtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentOA. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Appticant-Bankandthesubmissionmadebythe CounselforApplicantthattheDefendanthas deposited an amountofRs.4towardsfu[[and final settlementofthecase,thepresentOAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbeconsignedto therecordroom. (Ram asPatel) Presidingofficer |
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Bank
- respondent
Defendants
Coram
AI extract
Ram Patel
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court