Dismissed

Icici Bank Limited v. Utpal Naskar

DRT21 Jun 2024OA/72/2022

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

¶1

Debts Recovery Tribunal-3,^Kolkata Order Sheet (Continuation )

¶2

Case No. OA/72/2022

¶3

ICICI Bank Limited Vs. Utpal^Naskar

¶4

Dateof Order	Orderwithsignature
qrlerN9.6 D.211_06/²⁰²⁴ Sl.No.30	Presenti ForApplicant:^{Mr. AvishekGuhawithMs.ShreyaslSen and} MsRltikaPal,LdCounsels For DeFendant^:
som	LdCounsel^{for theApplicantfiledLA.No. 2070of 2024 inviewof} thefactthatthe^{O.A. wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs'} 26,79,9911-and^{prayedforwithdrawalof thepresentO A The} applicationissupported^{byaffidavitoflv1r.ShamimAslam,} AuthorizedSignatory^{oftheApplicantBankDuringthependency} of theO.A.the^{defendanthave compromisedandsettledthe} matter andtheapplicant^{bank hasrealizedand}'eceived the settled amount^{andissuedthe 'NoDues Certificate'andmade} prayertodisposeofthe matterfor^{nonprosecutionThereisno} otherimpedimentif^{prayer issoallowed. Accordrngly,I A No'} 2O7Oof2024 isdisposed^{ofaswithdrawnassettledamlcably'} The Applicanttsdirected^{toreturntheoriginalTitleDeedtothe} O.A.defendants^{ifitisnotalready returnedwathin 15 days from} the dateofthtsorder.So^{far asrefundofCourtfee isconcerned,} hemayapproachbeforethe^{LdRegistrarwhowilltake} appropriate decision^{inthe matterasperextantrules.} O.A.No.72of2022 alonq^{withallpendingl.A.s,ifany,are} dismissed aswithdrawnassettled^amicably. File beconsignedtoRecord^{Roomafterobserving allformalities.} PresidingOfficer DRT-3,Kolkata (K.nralDe)

Dateof
Order

Orderwithsignature

qrlerN9.6
D.211_06/²⁰²⁴
Sl.No.30

Presenti
ForApplicant:^{Mr. AvishekGuhawithMs.ShreyaslSen and}
MsRltikaPal,LdCounsels
For DeFendant^:

som

LdCounsel^{for theApplicantfiledLA.No. 2070of 2024 inviewof}
thefactthatthe^{O.A. wasfiledseeking recoveryofRs'}
26,79,9911-and^{prayedforwithdrawalof thepresentO A The}
applicationissupported^{byaffidavitoflv1r.ShamimAslam,}
AuthorizedSignatory^{oftheApplicantBankDuringthependency}
of theO.A.the^{defendanthave compromisedandsettledthe}
matter andtheapplicant^{bank hasrealizedand}'eceived
the
settled amount^{andissuedthe 'NoDues Certificate'andmade}
prayertodisposeofthe matterfor^{nonprosecutionThereisno}
otherimpedimentif^{prayer issoallowed. Accordrngly,I A No'}
2O7Oof2024 isdisposed^{ofaswithdrawnassettledamlcably'}
The Applicanttsdirected^{toreturntheoriginalTitleDeedtothe}
O.A.defendants^{ifitisnotalready returnedwathin 15 days from}
the dateofthtsorder.So^{far asrefundofCourtfee isconcerned,}
hemayapproachbeforethe^{LdRegistrarwhowilltake}
appropriate decision^{inthe matterasperextantrules.}
O.A.No.72of2022 alonq^{withallpendingl.A.s,ifany,are}
dismissed aswithdrawnassettled^amicably.
File beconsignedtoRecord^{Roomafterobserving allformalities.}
PresidingOfficer
DRT-3,Kolkata
(K.nralDe)

Icici Bank Limited v. Utpal Naskar

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Icici Bank Limited versus Imran Siddique and Ors.

Uco Bank versus Chandan Jaiswal and Ors.

Punjab National Bank (United Bank of India) versus Ms Shivam Potato and Onion Supply and Anr.

Indian Bank versus Alok Chanda

Icici Bank Limited v. Utpal Naskar

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Icici Bank Limited versus Imran Siddique and Ors.

Uco Bank versus Chandan Jaiswal and Ors.

Punjab National Bank (United Bank of India) versus Ms Shivam Potato and Onion Supply and Anr.

Indian Bank versus Alok Chanda

Canara Bank versus Shyamalesh Pal

Icici Bank Limited versus Prabir Roy and Anr.