Applicant sought withdrawal and refund of court fees after amicable settlement. Tribunal allowed interlocutory application, dismissed original application as withdrawn, and ordered refund.
Permission granted to withdraw original application. OA allowed with no order as to costs. Original application dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.14
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.865 of 2024 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.678 of 2023
HDFC Bank
… Applicant
Versus
Purvi Fulchand Jayawala … Defendant
Mr Prashant Phophale i/b M/s. PMH Law – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 23rd April 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
23.04.2024 Sr. No.14
| OA No.678 of 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
HDFC Bank Vs. Purvi Fulchand Jayawala |
| Mr Prashant Phophale i/b M/s. PMH Law – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.865 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.865 of 2024, Original Application No.678 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
HDFC Bank
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
