Partly allowed

Bank of Baroda v. Ms White Sand Productions

DRT6 May 2024OA/608/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed the interlocutory application for withdrawal of the original application following an amicable settlement. The original application was dismissed as withdrawn, and the registrar was directed to refund court fees and register the application.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory application allowed; Original Application dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees directed.

Bank of Baroda versus Ms White Sand Productions — DRT (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶2

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

¶3

Sr. No.14

¶4

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.967 of 2024

¶5

In ORIGINAL APPLICATION (D) NO.933 of 2021

Bank of Baroda

… Applicant

Versus

Ms White Sand Productions Datt &

¶10

Ors.

¶11

… Defendants

¶12

Mr Madhur Rai – Advocate for the applicant.

¶13

None for defendants.

¶14

Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer,

¶15

6^th May 2024.

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Mr Rai, representing the applicant, submits that parties have amicably settled the matter for Rs.25,08,243.51 in full and final satisfaction of the applicant’s claim. It is stated that the court fees is not debited from the borrower’s account and therefore, it is entitled for the refund. Mr Rai seeks the Tribunal’s permission to withdraw the Original Application. Permission granted. Interlocutory Application No.967 of 2024 is allowed with no order as to costs.

¶18

Sd/-

¶19

(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶20

Radhika

¶21

IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI

¶22

(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)

¶23

ORDER SHEET

¶24

06.05.2024 Sr. No.14

¶25

		OA(D) No.933 of 2021
classifi -cation	No. of Exh.	Bank of Baroda Vs. Ms White Sand Productions Datt & Ors.
		Mr Madhur Rai – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants.
	7	1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.967 of 2024 supported by affidavit (exhibit-7), which is taken on record.
		2. Order in Interlocutory Application No.967 of 2024 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.967 of 2024,
		Original Application (D) No.933 of 2021 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. 5. The learned Registrar is directed to register the Original Application.
		Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai

¶26

Radhika

Bank of Baroda v. Ms White Sand Productions

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bank of Baroda v. Ms White Sand Productions

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ms Advance Coolers and Anr. versus Punjab and Maharshtra Cooperative Bank

Hindustan Mikars Paper Pvt. Ltd. versus Phoenix Arc Ltd.

Lakhpati Arora versus India Resurgence Arc Pvt. Ltd.

Trend Settlers versus Syndicate Bank

Mr. Manish Ashok Bajaj versus Icici Bank Limited

Bank of Baroda versus Mr. Puneetkaur Dhanda