Bank of Baroda sought permission to withdraw Original Application No.207 of 2022 after an amicable settlement. The Tribunal allowed the withdrawal, dismissed the O.A. as withdrawn, and directed a refund of court fees.
Permission granted to withdraw; O.A. dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refunded; original documents returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.17
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.926 of 2024 In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.207 of 2022
Bank of Baroda
… Applicant
Versus
Mr. Puneetkaur Dhanda & Anr. … Defendants
Ms Meet Pandya i/b Mr Jayesh Desai – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer,th May 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
07.05.2024
Sr. No.17
| OA No.207 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
Bank of Baroda Vs. Mr. Puneetkaur Dhanda & Anr. |
| Ms Meet Pandya i/b Mr Jayesh Desai – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.926 of 2024 passed separately. |
||
| 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.926 of 2024, Original Application No.207 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to (i) refund the court fees and (ii) to return the original documents as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Bank of Baroda
Mr. Puneetkaur Dhanda
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
