Disposed
Canara Bank v. M/S Mahideep Buildcon
DRTOA/480/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
An oral application filed by a bank was disposed of as withdrawn after defendants deposited dues and settled the account.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of the present oral application allowed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
CONTD .o RDER-SHEET
¶2
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA480/22 11/06/24 |
ApplicantbyShriAmitGarg, Advocate NonefortheDefendants |
|
| CounselfortheAppticantBankhasfitedan appticationforwithdrawalofthecaselA3929123 dated22108123atongwithAffidavitofShriGaurav Rajauria,Branch Head.ltisstatedthattheAppticant- Bank hasfitedthepresentOAforrecoveryofdebts againsttheDefendants.ltisfurtherstatedthat duringthependencyoftheOAthematterthe Defendants havesettted thedues bydepositingRs.60 Lacandtheaccountbecomeoperativeand standard. TheCounselfortheAppticant-bankfurtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentOA. |
||
| ConsideringtheaffidavitoftheOfficerofthe Appticant-Bankandthesubmissionmadebythe CounseIforApplicantthattheDefendantshave deposited an amountofRs.60Lacandtheaccount becameoperativeandstandard,thepresentOA standsdisposedofaswithdrawn.Recordbe consignedtotherecordroomatJabalpur. asPatet) Pre ingofficer |
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court