The Tribunal disposed of an application (OA) seeking recovery by the applicant-Bank as withdrawn. The case was fully setdlemented by respondents depositing the entire amount. Registry directed 25% court fee refund to applicant.
OA treated as withdrawn; 25% court fee refunded to applicant-Bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
coN TD. ORDER-S HE ET
CASE No
| DATE | F o THEoRDER DESCRIPTION |
REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA332/22 10/06/24 |
Appticantby Shri L.P. Yadav, Advocate Defendantsare ex-parte |
|
| CounselfortheApplicantBankhasfitedJoint Appticationforwithdrawalofthecaseand refund of appticationfee,A2492/24dated09/04/24supported withtheAffidavitofShriVirendraSinghTomar Chief Managerof theBankand Shri Ka[i Kant Jha Defendant No.-' |
.ltisstatedthattheAppticant-Bankhasfited thepresentOAfor itsrecoveryofRs.90,95,801 .00 alongwithinterestandcosts againsttheDefendants. Itis statedthatduringthependencyoftheOAthe Defendantshavedepositedentiresetttementamount ofRs.66LacandtheApplicant-Bankdoesnotwants toprosecutetheaforesaid case.TheCounselfor Appticant submitsthat theBankfurtherpraysfor withdrawal of thepresentOA. |
|
| Consideringthe JointAppticationandthesubmission madebytheCounselforAppticantthatthe Defendantshave depositedtheentirecompromise amountofRs.66Lactowardsfu[andfinal settlementofthedues,thepresentOAstands disposedofaswithdrawn.Theregistryofthis Tribunalisdirectedtorefund25%oftheCourtFeeto theAppticant-Bank.Recordbeconsignedtothe recordroom. iwas Patet) Presidingofficer |
Bank
Defendants
Patet
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
