Dismissed
Icici Bank Limited v. Ghanshyam
DRTOA/387/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Dismissed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
¶2
01.03.2024 Sr. No.56
¶3
| SA No.387 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Ms Samartha Enterprises Vs. Indian Bank |
| None for the applicant. Ms Bushra Shaikh i/b Ms Fatima Lakdawala – Advocate for defendant. |
||
| 1. On 23rdFebruary 2024, no representation was made by the applicant and therefore, the matter is listed under caption dismissal. Even today, no representation is made by the applicant either personally or through the advocate. It appears that the applicant is not interested |
||
| in prosecuting the case any further. Hence, |
||
| Securitisation Application No.387 of 2022 stands dismissed with no order as to costs. 2. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
¶4
Radhika
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Ms Samartha Enterprises
- respondent
Indian Bank
Coram
AI extract
Presiding Officer
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court