In an interlocutory application, permission was granted to withdraw the original application after the parties amicably settled the matter. The original application was subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw Original Application No.345 of 2022 granted; case dismissed as withdrawn; court fees refund directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
= IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.42
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.680 of 2024
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.345 of 2022
Union Bank of India … Applicant
Versus
Dcon India Construction … Defendant
Mr B.N. Joshi i/b M/s. Annand Singh & Asso. – Advocates for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 1st April 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
01.04.2024
Sr. No.42
| OA No.345 of 2022 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Union Bank of India Vs. Dcon India Construction |
| Mr B.N. Joshi i/b M/s. Annand Singh & Asso. – Advocates for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Interlocutory Application No.680 of 2024 passed separately. |
||
| 2. In view of the order passed in Interlocutory Application No.680 of 2024, Original Application No.345 of 2022 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Union Bank of India
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
