Debts Recovery Tribunal allowed an application to return original title deeds to the applicant after the parties amicably settled the dispute. No order as to costs was passed.
Return of original title deeds as per Exhibit-E to the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.8
ORDER
In
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.22 of 2024
Bank of Baroda
… Applicant
Versus
Sarvom Steel Pvt. Ltd.
… Defendant
Mrs A.W. Barve – Advocate for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 15th March 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
15.03.2024 Sr. No.8
| MA No.22 of 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Bank of Baroda Vs. Sarvom Steel Pvt. Ltd. |
| Mrs A.W. Barve – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in Miscellaneous Application No.22 of 2024 passed separately. 2. The learned Registrar is directed to return the original |
||
| documents as per Exhibit-E to the Miscellaneous Application. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Bank of Baroda
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
