The Debt Recovery Tribunal dismissed the Original Application as withdrawn following an amicable settlement between the parties for the full amount and the refund of court fees.
Interlocutory Application allowed; Original Application dismissed as withdrawn; refund of court fees directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.24
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.280 of 2024
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.269 of 2024
IDBI Bank
… Applicant
Versus Hussain Khajesab Shaikh … Defendant
Mrs A.W. Barve – Advocate for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 5th March 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Nidhi
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
ORDER SHEET
05.03.2024
Sr. No.24
| OA No.269 of 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| classifi- cation |
No. of Exh. |
IDBI Bank Vs. Hussain Khajesab Shaikh |
| Mrs A.W. Barve – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 1. Order in I.A. No.280 of 2024 passed separately. 2. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.280 of 2024, Original Application No.269 of 2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 3. The learned Registrar is directed to refund the court fees as per the Rules. 4. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Nidhi
IDBI Bank
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
