DT admitted non-prosecution by the applicant in Original Application No.229/2023 and dismissed the matter for lack of active prosecution by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER, CAMP AT NANDED) ORDER SHEET
30.01.2024
| Sr | . No.2 | 9 O.A.No.229/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classific ation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| ORIGINAL APPLICATION No.229/2023 | ||
| Union Bank Of India ..Applicant Versus M/S Krushnai Meditext Pvt Ltd ..Defendants |
||
| Mr. Pande K D - Advocate for the applicant. None for defendants The matter is taken through Hybrid. 1. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the bank has to take appropriate steps in the matter and request for adjournment. There is an order dated 22.12.2023 passed in the matter regarding clarification. The bank has not taken any steps. It appears that the applicant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. |
||
| 2. In view of the above, I pass the following order : ORDER |
||
| D. The Original Application No.229/2023 stands dismissed for non-prosecution. |
||
| E. All pending IA in the proceeding, if any are disposed of accordingly. F. Consign the file to the Record Room and orders be uploaded on official web-site. |
||
(Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[APK]
Union Bank Of India
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
