The applicant in a securitization application sought adjudication on a disputed account.
Securitisation Application No.305/2023 and all interlocutory applications, though not mentioning specific section relies on SBA 2002, but text says account is closed and settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, AURANGABAD
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER AT AURANGABAD) ORDER SHEET
| 2 S |
9.01.2 r. No. |
024 49 SA No. 305/2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Classifi cation |
No. of Exh. |
|
| SECURITIZATION APPLICATION No. 305/2023 | ||
| Shubham Subhash Bajpai ..Applicant Versus Maharashtra Gramin Bank ..Respondent None for the applicant. Mr. J.R. Kalyankar - Advocate for the respondent. The matter is taken through VC. 1. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank submits that the account has been settled and the entire amount has been received by the bank and the account is closed.He requests for disposal of the matter. 2. In view of the above statement made by the counsel for the respondent-bank, I pass the following order through video conferencing. ORDER A. As the account is closed and nothing remains to be paid the Securitisation Application No.305/2023 stands dismissed. |
||
| B. Accordingly all the interlocutory applications stand disposed off. C. Consign the file to the Record Room. (Vimal Gupta) Presiding Officer Debts Recovery Tribunal, Aurangabad |
[SBJ] (SA No.305/2023) Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shubham Subhash Bajpai
Maharashtra Gramin Bank
Vimal Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
