Order on an application where the applicant bank withdraws prosecution after the defendants deposited the compromise amount of Rs. 8,40,000/-. The OA is disposed of as withdrawn.
Application disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
PAGE No
CONTD. ORDER-SHEET
CASE No
| DATE | DESCRIPTIONOFTHE ORDER | REMARK |
|---|---|---|
| oA1284 02t05/24 |
3 ShriNitinAgrawal,AdvfortheApplicanr Noneforthe Defendant |
|
| TheCounselforApplicanthasfiledMemo alongwithaffidavitofShriSanjayghuaorir, Manager,on20104124whichi,o,..roia.ft 1; stateO,UVthe Deponentonoath thatduring thependencyofthemattertheDefendants have settledtheaccount andhadarporit.Jun amountofRs.8,40,000/_.Itisfurtherdeposed that theaccounthas beenclosedu..o.aingfy. ThecounselfortheApplicant_Bunkfurt'h., praysfor withdrawaloltheinstantcase. |
||
| Keepinginviewthefact thatthcDel.endants have deposited thecompromiseamountofRs. 8,40,000/-and theApplicant_Bank doesnot wish toprosecutethecasefurther,thepresent OAstands disposedofaswithdrr*n. it..o.O beconsignedtotherecord room. (Ra was atel) PresidingOlficcr DRT:JABALPUR (M.P.&C.(;.) |
Manor
Defendant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
