Icici Bank Limited versus Dilip Singh Gurjar

Whereas the applicant bank has filed the^{instant OA in this} Tribunal for recovery of a sum of Rs. 25,48,620.44^{together with future} and pendentelite interest, cost etc. against^{the defendants.}

¶17

Whereas during the^pendency of the case before the^DRT, Jabalpur the applicant bank and the defendants^{have mutually} consented to settle the loan account and in this regard the^Applicant- Bank has filed an affidavit of Shri Rajul Gurjar, Debt^{Manager, for} withdrawal of the case.

¶18

Now in terms of reference made by the Counsel for the Applicant before this Lok Adalat on this 09th Day of March ,2024 the Parties have mutually settled the loan account and Defendants have deposited the

¶19

$,\NrJ\t-.r-

¶20

2

¶21

entire compromise amount of Rs. 16 Lac^{(Rupees Sixteen Lac only) in} full and final settlement. The Counsel for Applicant^{prays for} withdrawal of the case as there remains nothing to^recover from^the Defendants. ln view of the statement made before this^{Lok Adalat,the} OA No.-1218122 is disposed of as withdrawn. Court fee be^refunded as per rules.

¶22

Copy of this order be provided to the concerned^parties or their representatives.

¶23

(Given under the hand and seal of the Lok Adalat Bench on this the 09th Day of March ,2024).

¶24

\t\il^rilr-

¶25

(Praveen Chaturvedi) Member

¶26

( Patel) Presiding Officer

Icici Bank Limited v. Dilip Singh Gurjar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Icici Bank Limited v. Dilip Singh Gurjar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Simran Upadhyay versus Axis Bank

Sarita Barua versus Punjab National Bank

Malkhan Singh versus Aspire Home Finance Corporation Ltd.

Punjab National Bank versus M/S Bhanumati Warehouse

Indian Bank versus Krishna Poly Extrusion

Punjab National Bank versus Amarjeet Singh Now Deceased