On settlement, the Debts Recovery Tribunal permitted the applicant to withdraw the original recovery application and directed refund of court fees.
Original application withdrew settled; court fees refunded; original documents returned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.33
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.99 of 2024 In ORIGINAL APPLICATION NO.107 of 2023
Union Bank of India
… Applicant
Versus
Vivek R. Tahmankar … Defendant
Mr G.K. Swamy – Advocate for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 17th January 2024.
ORDER
Sd/-
(Deepak M. Thakkar) Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai
Radhika
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI (BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER) ORDER SHEET
17.01.2024 Sr. No.33
OA No.107 of 2023
| classifi -cation |
No. of Exh. |
Union Bank of India Vs. Vivek R. Tahmankar |
|---|---|---|
| Mr G.K. Swamy – Advocate for the applicant. None for defendant. |
||
| 12 | 1. The learned counsel for the applicant has presented I.A. No.99 of 2024 supported by affidavit (exhibit-12), which is taken on record. |
|
| 2. Order in Interlocutory Application No.99 of 2024 passed separately. 3. In view of the order passed in I.A. No.99 of 2024, Original Application No.107 of 2023 stands dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. 4. The learned Registrar is directed (i) to refund the court fees and (ii) to return the original documents as per the Rules. 5. All pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stands disposed of. |
||
| Sd/- Presiding Officer, DRT-2, Mumbai |
Radhika
Union Bank of India
Deepak M. Thakkar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
