Canara Bank v. Ajay
Case brief
What is this about?
Canara Bank sought permission to withdraw its original recovery application after an amicable settlement. The tribunal allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the original application.
What did the court decide?
Interlocutory application for withdrawal allowed; Original application No.1043 of 2023 dismissed as withdrawn; Court fee refund directed.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL No.2, MUMBAI
(BEFORE HON’BLE PRESIDING OFFICER)
Sr. No.18
INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION No.355 of 2024
In
ORIGINAL APPLICATION
NO.1043 of 2023
Canara Bank … Applicant
Versus
Ajay Thakur … Defendant
Ms Saraswati Rajpurohit i/b Mr Rajkumar Shukla – Advocate for the applicant.
None for defendant.
Shri Deepak M. Thakkar Presiding Officer, 1st March 2024.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Canara Bank
Coram
Deepak M. Thakkar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court