A Miscellaneous Application filed by defendants to condone a 249-day delay in setting aside an order was dismissed. The court rejected arguments regarding communication gaps and late notice, noting the failure to file a written statement despite prior adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
oA 637/20L9
t0.06.2024
MA No.2O5l2O23:
ZP"s
P.O.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether delay of 249 days in filing an application to set aside an order can be condoned.
Whether communication gap and late knowledge of proceedings constitute sufficient grounds for condonation of delay.
Defendants 1 to 5
P.O.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
