Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Icici Bank Limited versus Kamala — Arbitration | DRT (2024)

Home
DRT
2024
Icici Bank Limited versus KamalaIcici Bank Limited v. Kamala

Disposed

Icici Bank Limited v. Kamala

DRT8 Jun 2024OA/910/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Lok Adalat acquitted defendants in debt recovery proceeding. The parties reached an out-of-court settlement during pendency.

What did the court decide?

The dispute was settled by depositing Rs.23,40,000/- by the defendants.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL . II HYDERABAD

AWARD

DATED: 08.06.2024

IN

oRTGINAL APPLTCATION NO. 910/2023

PRESENT: -

SRI GUMMADI GOPICHAND, PRESIDING OFFICER, DRT-I (JUDICIAL-MEMBER)

SRI S.M. HUSSAIN, SENIOR ADVOCATE- MEMBER

SRI A. NARESH, ADVOCATE- MEMBER

(Incharge Lok Adalat Bench for DRT-II, Hyderabad - per Telangana state Legal services Authority - order Roc No.2z73/TSLsNLS/r024 dated 04.06.2024.) 04.06.2024.) n7 A\ti.;.. 7 A\ti.;.. i.;..

' .:...
dated 04.06.2024.) 04.06.2024.) n7 A\ti.;.. 7 A\ti.;.. i.;.. .--'..u
6+^ -'6il
;a Y',1*
Reference made by: ll "' {
!', '"7
Applicant Bank through: Mr. G. Adrian Kiran Ruj.\; (.," ,) tr
Defendants through :
\u'
W., , ,, ' ,.,rg^*q
;
Between :-:-
ICICI Bank Limited Bank Limited Limited
..... Appticant,

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
ICICI Bank Limited

Coram

AI extract

Sri Gumyadi Gopichand
Sri S.M. Hussain
Sri A. Narestl

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: DRT
Decided on: 8 Jun 2024 · June
Case no.: OA/910/2023
CNR: 280120016132023

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from P.o

Mrs Bhavnaben Mahendrabhai Kariya and Anr. versus State Bank of India
7 Jun 2024
Ms Krishna Construction and Others versus Canara Bank
7 Jun 2024
Surjeet Singh versus Bank of Maharashtra
7 Jun 2024
Hdfc Bank versus Purushotham Reddy
8 Jun 2024

Cite this judgement

Icici Bank Limited v. Kamala, OA/910/2023 (DRT), decided on 8 June 2024.

The Debt Recovery Tribunals publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Sri Gumyadi Gopichand and Sri S.M. Hussain and Sri A. Narestl

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The dispute was settled by depositing Rs.23,40,000/- by the defendants.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The proceedings were concluded through a settlement between the applicant bank and defendants. The defendants deposited the entire compromise amount of Rs.23,40,000/- in full and final settlement, resulting in the withdrawal of the case.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Between :-:-

ICICI Bank Limited Bank Limited Limited

Versus

Ramavath Kamala & Others.

...... Defendants.

whereas the applicant bank has filed the instant oA in this Tribunal for recovery of a sum of Rs.22,7s,206/- together with future interest, costs etc. against the defendants.

p.t.o.

O.A. No.91012023

Whereas during the^{pendencyof the case before this Tribunal,the} applicant bank and the^{defendants have mutuallyconsented to} settle the loan account.

Now, in terms of Memo dated^{26.04.2024filed by the Counselfor} the Applicant before the^{Lok Adalat on this 8th day of June, 2024,} the^parties have mutually settled the^{loan account and Defendants} deposited the entire compromise^{amount of Rs.23,40,000/- in full} and final settlement.^{The Counsel for Applicant prays for} withdrawal of the case as there^{remains nothing to recoverfrorn} the Defendants. In view of the^{said settlement made before this} Lok Adalat, the OA.9lO/2023^is disposed^{as withdrawn.Court fee} be refunded as^per rules.

Copy of this order be^{provided to the concernedparties or their} representatives.

(Given under the hand and seal of the Lok^{AdalatBench on this} the Bth day of June, 2024.)

(s.M. HUSSATN) ,^@*, Member Member

// MMADI GOPI Presidin s frl

,r'dffG
i6. ?reqrqr{
dP
*
ffi-r#
&s
{
Hyclerabad : '91.11

Topic

Bench

City Union Bank Limited versus Ganesh Steel Traders

8 Jun 2024

Punjab National Bank versus Koneygari Mohan Praveen Kumar

8 Jun 2024