The tribunal disposed of the application for recovery by treating the claim as settled out of court due to a partial remittance made by respondents towards full settlement, both parties agreeing to waive costs.
Application treated as settled out of Court without costs; Court fee refund prayer allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
T.A. No. 909 of 2023
19.07.2023
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-III, CHENNAI
Dated this the 19th day of July, 2023
Present: Shri Ganapathi K.R.K. Presiding Officer
TRANSFERRED APPLICATION No. 909 of 2023
(Originally filed before DRT- II, Chennai as OA No.200 of 2022 and thereafter transferred to this Tribunal and renumbered as TA No.909 of 2023)
M/s. Yes Bank Ltd, Parrys Branch, Dass India Towers Second Line Beach, 3, Beach Road, Parry’s Corner, George Town, Chennai – 600 001.
….Applicant
Vs
Rep by its partners, No. 411, LIG 2, 1st Main Road, 15th Cross Street, MMDA, Mathur,
Manali, Chennai – 600 068.
Counsels on record / appeared:
Counsel for Applicant : M/s. KVP. Deepak Raj
2
T.A. No. 909 of 2023
19.07.2023
ORDER
(Dictated to PS, transcribed by her, corrected, signed and processed through E-drt on this the 19th day of July, 2023)
Sd/- (GANAPATHI K.R.K) PRESIDING OFFICER
M/s. Yes Bank Ltd
M/s. Sri Lakshmi Transports
Vijayalakshmi
B.Senthil Kumar
Ganapathi K.R.K.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
