Disposed
Anil Kumar Pillai v. Canara Bank
DRTSA/90/2022
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
Disposed
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
PAGE No
¶2
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶3
CASE ilo
¶4
| DATE | DESCRIPTION OF THE ORDER | REUARK | |
|---|---|---|---|
| sA90122 0st09123 |
ShriAnujAgrawal,AdvfortheApplicant ShriVinay Tripathi,AdvfortheRespondent |
||
| l.Onmalter being takenforheari RespondentCounselbyplacingNOCsubm thataccountoftheApplicanthasalreadybe closed throughOTSschenteand outstandingliabilityisleft. 2.RespondentCounselfurlhersubmitstl afterclosingthcaccountNOChasalrea beenissued1otheApplicantthercforethere no needtoprosecutethis SAfurther. 3.ApplicantCounsel submitsthat1 Applicant hasnotintintatedtohimab< receivingthesaidNOChoweversir Respondent-Bank submittedNOCbefore1 BenchandtheIlespondent Counselapprisi theBenchthataccountofthcApplicant1 alreadybeensettledbyissuingNOCtherefi thismattermaybedisposedofaccordingly. |
S n o t ob at v is ut ce e e ob AS rc |
||
| 4.SinceRespondent-Bankhasalrea submittingNOCand appriscdthellcnchtl accountoltheApplicants has alrcadybe closedandNOChasalso beenissued,there noreasontodisbelievethestatement RespondentCounsclgivenbeforethc[]en, Thereforcinopinionol' thisBcnchnow needtoprosecutethis SAfurther. |
v at en h. no IS of |
||
| 5.Hencethis infurtous. SAisbeingdisposedol |
AS |
¶5
CONTD. ORDER.SHEET
¶6
PAGE No
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Anuj Agrawal
- respondent
Respondent-Bank
Coram
AI extract
Unknown
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court